Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1606
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorONIORE, Jonathan Ojarikre-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T12:57:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-03T12:57:27Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-27-
dc.identifier.issn2795-3483-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1606-
dc.description.abstractPolicy makers in Nigeria tend to regard public infrastructure as the key to long-run industrial and economic growth. But unfortunately, public infrastructure in Nigeria is typically in a fairly poor condition. Poor infrastructure reduces the profitability of modern manufacturing industrial sector and may therefore inhibit industrialization. Road systems are neglected, public transport and telecommunication systems are unreliable, power supply frequently breaks down, hence the study examined the link between public infrastructure capital and industrial sector growth and through that assessed the impact of public infrastructure capital on industrial sector growth in Nigeria. The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) methods were used for the analysis. The empirical results indicated that on one hand, public capital infrastructure captured by infrastructure development index, human capital development measured by human development index and inflation rate are negatively related to industrial sector growth in both the OLS and GMM frameworks. Broad money supply and exchange rate on the other hand, were found to have a positive relationship with industrial sector growth in both the OLS and GMM frameworks. It is thus concluded that for Nigeria, infrastructure exerts a negative impact on industrial sector growth. This outcome suggests that the level of access to infrastructure or its quality did not affect industrial growth. It is therefore recommended that policy direction in Nigeria should focus on reversing pervasive infrastructure deficit, in ways that enable economic growth and development. Specifically, government should look for other stable sources of financing infrastructures in Nigeria like the recent sukuk issue targeted at infrastructures development and financial inclusion.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Economics, Management and Trade 19(4): 1-12, 2017; Article no.JEMT.37144 ISSN: 2456-9216en_US
dc.subjectManufacturing growth; public infrastructure; Nigeriaen_US
dc.titleIndustrial Sector Growth and Public Infrastructure Capital in Nigeriaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Oniore1942017JEMT37144.pdf272.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.