Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2274
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMUSA, Sulieman-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-24T12:56:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-24T12:56:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationAJLHR4(1)2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2274-
dc.description.abstractCourts should not be repositories of abandoned cases. Such abandoned matters should be struck out for want of diligent prosecution be they criminal' or civil. The concern is that such cases are terminated not after hearing on the merit but have the effect of dismissal . This work finds that a person proceeding to the Supreme Court of Nigeria on appeal against the judgment/order of the Nigerian Court of Appeal under Order 19 Rule 10 would face legal challenges with constitutional implications. This work recommends for the abrogation of the provisions of Order 19 Rule I Oof the Court ofAppeal Rules. 2016. Key words: Dismissal, merit, rules. Court ofAppeal, fair hearingen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries4 1;182-187-
dc.subject: Fair hearing. Finality of Orders, Court of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules 2016, Nigeria, Order 19 Rule 10en_US
dc.titleFAIR HEARING AND THE FINALITY OF THE ORDERS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NIGERIAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FAIR HEARING AND THE FINALITY OF THE ORDERS OF THE COURT..doc104.48 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.