BHU Digital Repository

Journal of Law Review :Case Law Review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author DAVID, Dogara goar
dc.date.accessioned 2024-06-11T13:34:52Z
dc.date.available 2024-06-11T13:34:52Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation NILDS-JLR(2021) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2659-0565
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1828
dc.description.abstract Abstract Legal combatants fight their cases before courts on the basis of facts adduced before courts in evidence. The facts needed by courts are supplied by litigants through oral testimonies, affidavit evidence andpresumptions in appropriate cases . The vital place of affidavit evidence in litigation need not be overemphasised; it is the only means of supplying evidence in matters commenced by originating summons , matters commenced by originating motions and interlocutory applications. It is the importance of affidavit evidence in litigations that has made the decision of the Apex Court in Buhari v. I.N.E.C. that is an aberration from previous decisions of the same court on the implication ofparagraphs of an affidavit running afoul of section 115 of the Evidence Act a matter of great concern and a call for an urgent review of the decision of utmost importance. This work employs the doctrinal inquiry methodology, largely analysis of case law, to bring to the fore the need for a revision of the decision under review and a recommendation for the review proposed. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Legislative Support Services, en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries 4;256
dc.subject Affidavit, evidence, review, overrule ,Supreme Court. en_US
dc.title Journal of Law Review :Case Law Review en_US
dc.title.alternative JUDICIAL ATTITUDE TO EXTRANEOUS MATTERS IN AFFIDAVIT EVIDENCE en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BHUDR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account