BHU Digital Repository

THE ‘CONCURRENCY’/ ‘COORDINACY’ OF THE JURISDICTION OF STATES’ HIGH COURTS, CUSTOMARY AND SHARIA COURTS OF APPEAL: CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS ARASING MATTERS ARISING

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author MUSA, Sulieman
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-12T10:35:22Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-12T10:35:22Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation AJLHR 3(2) 2019 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2631
dc.description.abstract pacifiers are sometimes faced with the challenge of which appellate court to go from the decisions of customary/area /sharia courts. This confusion sometimes is heightened when the issues intended to be canvassed at the appellate court are not solely customary or. if Islamic, not purely Islamic personal law'. This piece, employing the analytical method, has consulted and analyzed statutes and judicial precedents and text books to put away the erroneous notion entertained by some jurists that the states' high courts, customary courts of appeal and sharia courts of appeal cannot be courts of coordinate Legal jurisdiction. It recommends, among other things, for the introduction of the topic of ‘courts of coordinate jurisdictions' in the law curriculum as it will enhance unity of people of diverse religions and cultures through the practice of law. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher New York West Publishing Group en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2;3 120-129
dc.subject Coordinate, concurrent, jurisdiction, high court, customary court of appeal and sharia court. en_US
dc.title THE ‘CONCURRENCY’/ ‘COORDINACY’ OF THE JURISDICTION OF STATES’ HIGH COURTS, CUSTOMARY AND SHARIA COURTS OF APPEAL: CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS ARASING MATTERS ARISING en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BHUDR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account