‘REQUIREMENT OF CONSENT IN THE ALIENATION OF INTERESTS IN LAND IN THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, ABUJA: THE CASE OF UNA VATENDA REVISITED’*

dc.contributor.author	MUSA, Sulieman
dc.date.accessioned	2024-07-12T11:51:47Z
dc.date.available	2024-07-12T11:51:47Z
dc.date.issued	2021
dc.identifier.citation	UOCLEP 3(1)2021	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2635
dc.description.abstract	This is a rejoinder to the contribution of Mr. Yusufon the above topic . This piece employs the doctrinal approach adopted by the Jurist, Mr. Yusuf, and would use the laws cited by him and other materials to arrive at a different conclusion arrived at by him; to wit, that ‘consent' is a sine qua non for the validity of any assignment of a right of occupancy over land in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja as against his position that it is not.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Faculty of Law Bingham University Karu	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	3;1 1-14
dc.subject	Consent, alienation, interests, land, Abuja.	en_US
dc.title	‘REQUIREMENT OF CONSENT IN THE ALIENATION OF INTERESTS IN LAND IN THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, ABUJA: THE CASE OF UNA VATENDA REVISITED’*	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US